Yeah, well one was puzzled at RFK Jnr's position re Wearable Palantir Technology! Will Israel have the key to the explosive? 🤔 or will Palantir watches determine who must wear Musk Nuerolinks, to be "gentled"...? NWO? 🖕
Regarding this new ACIP committee, this is clearly NOT and independent committee as their votes show total denial of all the data about the uselessness and harm of the flu vaccines. In over 20 yrs they have never been able to create a useful flu vaccine other than its use for mass profiterring for the Pharma/medical industry.
The pushing for vaccines for infants in particular also shows denial and/or ignorance of the universal harm to developing immune systems of newborns.
Given these pro-corporate votes for such drug cocktails, we will need to watch how they handle real critical questioning as should happen with robust impacts.
I know they will be “politic”, but real trust will not be restored until people like him tell the real truth about why they did not take the vaccine. Even if he had had COVID already, why not take it to keep your job, if it was safe? Puh-lease!
They're just starting out. The pressure on them is immense, from inside and outside. It would have been helpful if some really sharp medical freedom folks could have given public comment. Almost all of the commenters on both days were pediatricians describing babies they've treated with RSV who are gasping for air and close to death. A panelist or public commenter needed to only summarize some VAERS data and SIDS data on infant deaths following vaccination, and this would have provided some balance. This didn't happen, unfortunately.
They should have the backbone and integrity to do what is right FOR THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY.
Not to kowtow to "pressure", presumably from Big Pharma. Or whomever.
If they are unable to be proper guardians for the interests of the public, then they have the same problem as their predecessors: the have conflict of interest and are therefore corrupt.
They need to resign.
Get some people in there that have the balls to do their job.
We the People are sick of vax tyranny.
I speak from personal experience regarding vax injury.
Great speech. The best part is the analogy to airline safety. Perhap an even better analogy is to meat inspection. After the novel The Jungle came out around 1900, readers were so disgusted by what they learned about meatpacking that the meat industry realized they needed goverment inspections to regain public trust.
They voted 6-0 to reaffirm flu shots. I wouldn't have done that. Is it really clear they help enough to be worth it? Maybe, but they can keep them legal without recommending one way or the other.
A Cleveland Clinic study of over 53,000 employees showed that getting the flu vaccine increased the risk of getting the flu. So why did they think the benefit outweighed the risk. And what about the mRNA flu shots coming down the line? If they wanted to agree that traditional flu shots should be made available and not banned, as long as the recipient gives truly informed consent, then so be it. But they should not be routinely recommended for the population. And please leave us who are over the age of 65 out of the routine recommendations.
So what? The incoming CDC director loves vaccines and the FDA word and can veto anything ACIP recommends.
You’re right, Tom. All of this depends on the CDC Director who does not have to follow the advice of ACIP.
Yeah, well one was puzzled at RFK Jnr's position re Wearable Palantir Technology! Will Israel have the key to the explosive? 🤔 or will Palantir watches determine who must wear Musk Nuerolinks, to be "gentled"...? NWO? 🖕
Regarding this new ACIP committee, this is clearly NOT and independent committee as their votes show total denial of all the data about the uselessness and harm of the flu vaccines. In over 20 yrs they have never been able to create a useful flu vaccine other than its use for mass profiterring for the Pharma/medical industry.
The pushing for vaccines for infants in particular also shows denial and/or ignorance of the universal harm to developing immune systems of newborns.
Given these pro-corporate votes for such drug cocktails, we will need to watch how they handle real critical questioning as should happen with robust impacts.
I know they will be “politic”, but real trust will not be restored until people like him tell the real truth about why they did not take the vaccine. Even if he had had COVID already, why not take it to keep your job, if it was safe? Puh-lease!
Good point.
I appreciate this report and your coverage of these events!
So.
These new guys unanimously greenlit flu jabz.
A largely useless jab.
They also greenlit RSV jabz for newborns.
Known to be lethal for some.
This new panel is just as jab-happy as their Big Pharma backed predecessors.
They're just starting out. The pressure on them is immense, from inside and outside. It would have been helpful if some really sharp medical freedom folks could have given public comment. Almost all of the commenters on both days were pediatricians describing babies they've treated with RSV who are gasping for air and close to death. A panelist or public commenter needed to only summarize some VAERS data and SIDS data on infant deaths following vaccination, and this would have provided some balance. This didn't happen, unfortunately.
They should have the backbone and integrity to do what is right FOR THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY.
Not to kowtow to "pressure", presumably from Big Pharma. Or whomever.
If they are unable to be proper guardians for the interests of the public, then they have the same problem as their predecessors: the have conflict of interest and are therefore corrupt.
They need to resign.
Get some people in there that have the balls to do their job.
We the People are sick of vax tyranny.
I speak from personal experience regarding vax injury.
Great speech. The best part is the analogy to airline safety. Perhap an even better analogy is to meat inspection. After the novel The Jungle came out around 1900, readers were so disgusted by what they learned about meatpacking that the meat industry realized they needed goverment inspections to regain public trust.
They voted 6-0 to reaffirm flu shots. I wouldn't have done that. Is it really clear they help enough to be worth it? Maybe, but they can keep them legal without recommending one way or the other.
A Cleveland Clinic study of over 53,000 employees showed that getting the flu vaccine increased the risk of getting the flu. So why did they think the benefit outweighed the risk. And what about the mRNA flu shots coming down the line? If they wanted to agree that traditional flu shots should be made available and not banned, as long as the recipient gives truly informed consent, then so be it. But they should not be routinely recommended for the population. And please leave us who are over the age of 65 out of the routine recommendations.
I agree, that was disappointing.
I would love a list of vaccines that contain no poison. I bet it's a short list.
I am certain of that. ;)