Is this the man who really killed Charlie Kirk?
Video appears to show man in brown shirt detonating weapon at the same time shot rings out! Is he an Israeli? A member of the private security team?
For 19 days, citizen sleuths have pored over videos of the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and one of the valuable things they’ve been able to do is to dispel initial suspicions about certain people in the crowd and in the area around Charlie.
But no one has been able to explain away the man in the brown plaid shirt standing in the front row. The man appears to manipulate a lever under his shirt sleeve as the very moment Charlie was shot.
The man was wearing a brown plaid button-down shirt and aviator sunglasses, with his greyish or light brown hair slicked back in a style not worn by any other person in that audience. He was immediately fingered by YouTubers after the shooting as a suspicious person who may have had something to do with the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Now, videos are circulating that take a closer look at his strange behavior and include a startling theory about what exactly he was doing.
The man had his left hand stretched out, holding on to the metal barricade that separated Charlie and his people from the crowd of 3,000. Seconds before the shooting, he reached up with his right hand and appeared to pull something on his upper left shirtsleeve upwards. At that very moment, the shot rang out. The man didn’t flinch. In fact, he seemed to lean in to the shot with some satisfaction.
As Charlie slumped over in his chair, the man in the brown plaid shirt ran to the tent and can be seen in videos appearing to hand something off to one of the security guards, a man in a blue plaid shirt, who ran toward the SUV that was used to transport Charlie to the hospital.
The man in the brown shirt could be seen on other videos helping several other men carry Charlie Kirk to the SUV. All appeared to be part of Charlie’s security team.
In a video posted to X on Saturday, Stew Peters showed the actions of the man in the brown shirt several times over, in slow motion.
“He pushes the detonator. Clear as day,” says Peters in the video. “That’s the assassin. That’s the guy that pushes the detonator which perfectly aligns with the explosion that pushes that projectile through Charlie’s right side of his neck and out the left side, creating the exit wound.”
On Friday, former Green Beret Nate Cornacchia, who has the YouTube channel Valhalla VFT, was on the Alex Jones Show on InfoWars giving his take on what the video showed.
“What concerned me right away is he’s watching Charlie Kirk, he’s not watching the crowd. In any security detail, why are you staring at the person you’re protecting. That’s odd,” he said.
He continued:
“If you watch him here as he raises his hand here, it looks like he clicks something at the moment Charlie gets shot. He’s got a perfect line of sight to the neck.”
People began posting videos of “Brown Shirt Man” within a few days of the assassination. Here’s one of them:
Stew Peters starts his video with a shocking statement that Charlie Kirk was killed by his Israeli security team.
He goes on to say that he thinks the weapon is the lavalier microphone that is attached to Charlie’s t-shirt on the upper right side. It’s this microphone that detonates in Charlie’s shirt, he says, and launches the projectile into his neck, making an exit wound on the left side of the neck.
But others have pointed out that the lavalier mic does not even detach from the shirt after the shot.
And in this video, Chris Martenson of Peak Prosperity does an in-depth analysis of a particular, high-quality video of the shooting and says there’s no chance that a small weapon could have caused the enormous damage inside Charlie’s body that is evident on photos that show a swelling of the neck, which he refers to as a “high-speed cavitation event (severe overpressure).”
But Martenson, in his analysis of the angles of the shot, says he thinks there is no chance that shot could have been made by Tyler Robinson, and that it must have come from atop a building further to Charlie’s right.
Did the man in the brown plaid shirt have something to do with it?
Chris Martenson is worth listening to. Stew Peters less so in my opinion.
a button or lever could be used as the operator override for a robot autoturret. these days there are many, many popular variants of those which have been openly field tested since the turn of the century.
Israel is said to especially favor the autoturret tech, though they usually don't bother with the human operator override feature and just leave them on full auto. even if it accidentally pops an Israeli they just add that to the Hannibal Directive casualties and blame it on whichever other nation's citizens they deployed the autoturret against.